foversta[PuristSPro Moderator]
20814
This or that?
Jul 09, 2014,13:28 PM
First version of the 1966 Minute Repeater Annual Calendar:
Or new one?
The first version looks more contemporary while the new one plays a more classic tune with its guillochage on the center part of the dial and the applied figures.
I tend to prefer the first version for its purer approach.
And you?
Fx
Comments:
view entire thread
This or that?
By: foversta : July 9th, 2014-13:28
First version of the 1966 Minute Repeater Annual Calendar: Or new one? The first version looks more contemporary while the new one plays a more classic tune with its guillochage on the center part of the dial and the applied figures. I tend to prefer the ...
I would be happy with any of the two....
By: blomman Mr Blue : July 9th, 2014-13:55
But if I would get to choose, I would go for the new one! Because of the more classic look and more beautiful decoration. I am a big fan of pure design, but the applied numbers on the new version... Lovely! :) Thank you for sharing these two, Fx! Best Blo...
Frankly,
By: crown comfort : July 9th, 2014-14:45
I would drop the annual calendar and only enjoy a pure classic minute repeater as just shown in the forum by chronosRM. Great to see the comparison on your wrist, they are still incredible pieces, even out-smarted by its simple cousin. CC
First one for me, please.
By: jporos : July 10th, 2014-14:53
Just not as busy. ( But I am sure all of you knew which way I would go given the choice. So very predictable...)
Hmmmm
By: Mostel : July 22nd, 2014-22:48
The older version is sort of obscure and odd... People will ask, how do you tell time on it. What does it mean? The newer version has a more jewelry look to it, and somehow seems less mysterious, but also more busy. My verdict: reconsider this model altog...