Friends, Nicolas has already posted a review on this watch. The Girard-Perregaux 1966 Blue in Pink Gold Reference: 49525-52-432-BB4A Just a FYI before we start – these blue dials are horrible to take in photos! It’s almost impossible to get a good shot wi...
Hi Blomman, I think you cannot go wrong with the 1966, Ref 49525 as a classic dress watch. I also think the 38mm is ideal and size of the case is perfection in all aspects. I have once seen the previous blue dial version with Palladium case in the flesh a...
The PG /White makes a great combo! :) You are correct about the date window, much less interferance here. Question, is the second hand blued steel? Thank you for sharing yours! Please feel free to post more photos... Maybe a frontal shot? Best Blomman
I think if you are seriously looking at a modern GP, then it can only be either the 1966 or the Vintage 45, both are real design classics and will not age even fashion will change. If you limit yourself to the current collection then Vintage 45 almost onl...
This is exactly what I am going through in my mind for the last few month! Which way to go? If classic, my conclusions are exact what you wrote.... Are you spying on me, my friend...? ;) Best Blomman
date window at 3 destroys zen of otherwise very handsome watch maybe worst is white background for date if blue as dial it maybe could go :) Great insights though Yours D
But the date... Hmmmm, on this one, was it really necessary? It would have been more pure , cleaner, without... For those who don't want to see the date spoiling the dial, there is another very nice blue dial, the Vintage 45 XXL. Best, Nicolas This messag...
being impossible to capture well in photographs. I tried with the stainless steel 1945 and failed miserably. Count me in as one who likes the date on the dial. Bill
.. Although liking the whole "package" in PG, as is I guess, I'd rather would wait , if a WG emerges next year.. And yes, this even could be my first PG ... Best, hs PS: Although I know, we don't discuss prizing here, could you still give an approx estima...